When a second exit access is required in a suite, what is a true statement regarding the exit access doors?

In situations where a second exit access is required in a suite, the stipulation that one exit access door must be to the corridor is grounded in life safety principles defined by codes such as the NFPA 101 Life Safety Code. This requirement is in place to ensure that at least one of the means of egress leads directly to a corridor, which serves as a common path for occupants to reach the exits.

The corridor provides a designated path that promotes efficient evacuation and is typically equipped to handle larger amounts of traffic due to its intended use for the spread of occupants during an emergency. By requiring an exit access door to lead to the corridor, the code seeks to minimize confusion during evacuation and enhance the overall safety of the building's occupants, ensuring they can quickly, safely, and efficiently reach the exit. Additionally, corridors often have emergency lighting and are designed to protect against the spread of fire, further contributing to occupant safety.

Other options may suggest routes that do not adequately ensure safe egress in accordance with established safety protocols. For instance, having both exit access doors lead to adjoining suites may limit the effective escape routes available during an emergency, potentially creating risks if those adjoining suites were compromised by smoke or fire. Thus, the requirement for at least one